I’ve been working through improving quill and I have the perception that the core maintainers have left the project and that it’s become a burden on it’s community.
Then because I’m still using the project. And my preference was to improve quill for the time being rather than to move to another library. I am publishing my fork of the project and further welcome anyone who wants to improve quill to contribute.
https://github.com/li-nkSN/zio-protoquill
https://github.com/li-nkSN/zio-quill
With artifacts published at
https://central.sonatype.com/search?q=org.li-nk
Through “aggressive caching” of the macro process I have seen the following for protoquill:
┌────────────────┬────────────┐
│ Version │ Wall Clock │
├────────────────┼────────────┤
│ baseline │ 166s │
├────────────────┼────────────┤
│ implicit-cache │ 62s │
├────────────────┼────────────┤
│ macrotimer-v1 │ 62s │
├────────────────┼────────────┤
│ cache-fix │ 59s │
├────────────────┼────────────┤
│ typeinfo-opt │ 61s │
└────────────────┴────────────┘
And furthermore I believe there is a possible /N improvement against my build if the feature https://github.com/scala/scala3/pull/19589 ships.
This “fork” of quill is not meant to disrespect any of the quill contributors or communities. This is rather a nod to my perception of value that the product created.